Diversifying MyPlate: Chinese Cuisine

The Dietary Guidelines for Americans and their associated MyPlate graphic are commonly referenced resources for learning about healthy and nutritious eating. The recently updated 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans put a stronger focus on meeting dietary recommendations while keeping cultural preferences in mind, and resources highlighting culturally inclusive approaches are valuable tools for translating the general messages of MyPlate and the Dietary Guidelines to more Americans. This article is part of a series that shows how healthy eating can take on many different forms outside of the Western diet. The featured guest authors will demonstrate what healthy eating looks like in their culture and how many of the MyPlate food groups and principles can translate across varying cultures and world cuisines. Each article in this series is written by a registered dietitian who is experienced in integrating culturally inclusive approaches into their work. About the Author My name is Michelle Jaelin (in Traditional Chinese, 關靜嫻). I’m a TV-media and communications dietitian, and my main focus in dietetics is on Asian food and cultural nutrition. I’m of Chinese descent, my parents are from Hong Kong, and I am Canadian-born. Watching my English-as-a-second-language parents try to navigate and understand the healthcare system inspired me to focus on this area in dietetics. Given that traditional dietary guidelines are based on Euro-centric diets, I didn’t find the information out there inclusive enough to Asian Canadians and other ethnic groups. My cultural preference is on mainly the Chinese diet in North America. In China there are many diverse cuisines, eight of which are considered primary or “high” cuisines. This particular article emphasizes mostly cuisine from Guangdong province, a coastal province in South China that has evolved to become a part of American culture. The History of Chinese People and Cuisine in North America The Chinese […]

article

The Case for CRISPR

When some people hear the term “selective breeding,” they assume it’s a fairly recent technology. Well, they would be off just a little bit — by about 12,000 years, to be precise. Practices such as breeding crops for desirable traits are almost as old as agriculture itself. Fast-forward to barely 150 years ago when we first began to understand genetics. Our working knowledge of DNA dates back only to the mid-20th century, and only then did genetic engineering get more sophisticated. Just a few decades removed, the intersection between science and food is at perhaps the most exciting place yet. With the rise of “big data,” we are beginning to see the connection between genetics and the food we eat, also called nutrigenomics. And now we stand on the cusp of a potentially revolutionary technology called “CRISPR.” It might sound like a drawer in your refrigerator, but it’s actually a tool that could bring enormous benefits to the food system. What is CRISPR? Before we dive into CRISPR, trust us, you may want to be sure to brush up on some basic genetics and biology so that the terms we use aren’t too foreign. CRISPR is one of many methods to alter the genetic information in the cells of living things — plants, fruits, vegetables, etc. That genetic information is called DNA, which are chains of molecular building blocks called nucleotides. DNA can produce proteins that define what an organism’s cells do or don’t do — kind of like how software controls the operation of a computer. Snippets or “sequences” of DNA called genes, pass down inherited traits over generations, tend to be stable, changing only slightly over time as organisms evolve and adapt to new conditions. Sometimes these changes are visible, such as the color of a flower, and […]

article

Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? Six Tips To Make Your Holiday Meal Planning Easy

A few years ago, I hosted my first Thanksgiving dinner, which turned into a wild scramble in my tiny apartment kitchen while I cooked a meal for seven. On top of all that, my sister-in-law was coming, and her wheat allergy made things a little trickier. Hosting a big meal for guests with food allergies can be challenging, especially when everyone is depending on you to make a safe, delicious, mistake-free meal. While I was fortunate to know which allergies to look out for in my cooking, sometimes guests show up without notice. My list of tips below can help keep your holiday dinners running smoothly, even if there’s an unexpected guest at your table. In fact, sometimes surprises give you an opportunity to get creative in the kitchen! 1. Offer allergy-free alternatives. Instead of scrapping a dish altogether, offer an allergen-free alternative dish to ensure everyone can enjoy a little of everything. For my family, stuffing is the big hit, but I knew we would need an alternative for my wheat-free sister-in-law. We don’t stuff the turkey, so there wasn’t a risk of cross-contact with the turkey, but I still wanted everyone to enjoy this iconic side dish. My solution: cornbread stuffing in addition to classic wheat bread stuffing. Here are some other ideas for adjusting popular side dishes: swap out cow’s milk for coconut milk in mashed potatoes; leave the walnuts on the side for the sweet potato casserole; and make a crust-less apple crisp instead of apple pie. 2. Keep allergen-containing foods separate. In an ideal world, we would have the space of a commercial kitchen to cook our holiday meals. My tiny city apartment was far from ideal. This meant being extra vigilant about separating food ingredients. While one of my top concerns was keeping raw […]

insights

Everything You Need To Know About Acesulfame Potassium

What is acesulfame potassium? Acesulfame potassium is a no-calorie sweetener that is used in foods and beverages to provide sweetness without the added calories contained in sugars. While some types of sweeteners are considered no-calorie (e.g., acesulfame potassium, monk fruit sweeteners, stevia sweeteners and sucralose) and others are low-calorie (e.g., aspartame), this category of ingredients is often collectively referred to as artificial sweeteners, high-intensity sweeteners, low-calorie sweeteners, low- and no-calorie sweeteners, nonnutritive sweeteners or sugar substitutes. Originally developed by German researchers in 1967, acesulfame potassium was first approved for use in Europe in 1983. Five years later, in 1988, it was approved in the U.S. Today, it is often used in combination with other low- and no-calorie sweeteners, such as aspartame and sucralose, to provide a more sugar-like taste than acesulfame potassium provides on its own. Like other low- and no-calorie sweeteners, acesulfame potassium is intensely sweet. It is about 200 times sweeter than sucrose (table sugar), so only small amounts are used to match the sweetness provided by sugar. Acesulfame potassium retains its sweetness at a wide range of temperatures and in many food-processing conditions, which allows it to be used as an ingredient in a variety of food products, including baked goods, beverages, candies, chocolates, dairy products, desserts, and more. When acesulfame potassium is used as an ingredient in a packaged food or beverage, it will appear in the ingredient list for that product as either Ace-K, acesulfame K, or acesulfame potassium. Acesulfame potassium is also used as an ingredient in some tabletop sweeteners. The most common brand of sweetener in the U.S. that contains acesulfame potassium is Equal® Original. What happens to acesulfame potassium after consumption? Acesulfame potassium provides sweet taste quickly after it is consumed. Eventually, it is completely absorbed into our blood from the gut, […]

article

Everything You Need to Know About Stevia Sweeteners

Download the Stevia Fact Sheet for Consumers here Download the Stevia Face Sheet for Health Professionals here WHAT ARE STEVIA SWEETENERS? Stevia sweeteners are no-calorie sweeteners that can be used to lower one’s intake of added sugars while still providing satisfaction from enjoying the taste of something sweet. While some types of sweeteners in this category are considered low-calorie (e.g., aspartame) and others are no-calorie (e.g., stevia sweeteners, monk fruit sweeteners and sucralose), collectively they are often referred to as sugar substitutes, high-intensity sweeteners, non-nutritive sweeteners or low-calorie sweeteners. Like other no-calorie sweeteners, stevia sweeteners are intensely sweet. Stevia sweeteners range from being 200-350 times sweeter than sugar, and as such only small amounts of stevia sweeteners are needed to match the sweetness provided by sugar. Stevia sweeteners can be used by food and beverage manufacturers as an ingredient in beverages (such as diet sodas, light or low-sugar juices and flavored waters), canned fruits, condiments, dairy products (such as ice cream, flavored milk and yogurt) and other foods (such as baked goods, cereals, chocolate and other confections) and syrups. Because they are stable at high temperatures, stevia sweeteners can be used in baked goods. However, a recipe that uses stevia sweeteners in place of sugar may turn out slightly different because, in addition to sweetness, sugar plays several roles related to volume and texture in recipes but varies based on the type of recipe. Stevia sweeteners are also used in several tabletop sweeteners, such as Truvia®, Pure Via®, Stevia In The Raw®, SPLENDA® Naturals Stevia Sweetener, SweetLeaf® and Enliten®, as well as other retail products sold under store-brand names. HOW ARE STEVIA SWEETENERS PRODUCED? Stevia sweeteners are derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) plant, an herbal shrub native to South America. The stevia plant has been used […]

article

New IFIC Survey Reveals How Misunderstood Food Date Labels Are Likely Feeding America’s Trash Cans

(Washington, D.C.) — Millions of Americans rely on food date labels to make decisions about what is safe to eat—and what gets thrown out. But new research from the International Food Information Council (IFIC) reveals that these labels may be doing more harm than good when it comes to preventing food waste. The IFIC Spotlight Survey: Americans’ Perceptions Of Food Date Labeling, dives into how U.S. consumers interpret phrases like “Best by,” “Use by,” and “Best if used by.” Nearly half (48%) of respondents correctly believe these labels signal when a product begins to decline in quality. Another 29% see them as an indication of food safety risk, while 17% interpret them as the exact day the food should be discarded. “Consumers are trying to do the right thing when it comes to keeping themselves and their families safe,” said Wendy Reinhardt Kapsak, MS, RDN, IFIC President & CEO. “But when they cannot tell the difference between quality and safety, food that is perfectly fine to eat may end up in the trash. This confusion is not just a household inconvenience—it is a public health and sustainability issue.” More Than A Third Throw Food Away Without Checking It This confusion plays out in daily behavior. More than 1 in 3 Americans (36%) say they discard food without assessing it once the “Best if used by” date has passed. While 54% report evaluating the food first, the criteria they use remain inconsistent and unclear. Confidence in labels is also low. Only 29% of Americans said they have high confidence in the accuracy of food date labels, while the majority (52%) reported medium confidence, and 19% had low or no confidence at all. “Labeling should be helpful, easy to understand, not misleading,” said Tony Flood, IFIC Senior Director of Food & Ingredient […]

Media

The Protein Truths You’ve Been Waiting For

The word of cod. The gospel of tofu. The dogma of soy. Finally, the 2015 Food and Health Survey has shed light on what Americans think about all things protein (and plenty of other food issues too!). While a few protein facts seem well-known, some of us could use a refresher on the benefits of protein.   Protein 101 Gear up for a crash course in protein wisdom, and see if you know protein better than the average American. #1 “It is important to get enough protein in your diet”  (Americans nailed it!) 9 out of 10 Americans know it’s important to get enough protein in their diet. We humans are essentially made of proteins; protein provides structure for every cell in the body. Brittle hair, lackluster skin, and fatigue are all symptoms of protein deficiency. Consuming adequate protein allows for optimal muscle growth and keeps us full between meals.   #2 “Distributing your protein intake throughout the day is the best way to consume protein.”  (A little weaker…) 1 in 4 Americans are unaware that you need to distribute protein evenly throughout the day to promote muscle health. A 2014 study in the Journal of Nutrition showed that muscle growth is 25% higher when protein is evenly distributed through breakfast, lunch, and dinner, compared to the traditional high-protein evening meal. A good rule of thumb is to get 15-30 grams of protein per meal. Cheat sheet: 3 oz of chicken has roughly 25 grams of protein, and 3 oz of firm tofu contains 6 grams of protein.   #3 “Protein can help maintain muscle as you age” (Needs improvement!) Almost 20% of Americans are unaware of the benefits of protein in aging. Older adults require consistent protein intake at each meal to maintain muscle health. However, certain diseases and […]

article

GMO Crops: Safety, Regulation and Sustainability Insights

Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are a popular topic in today’s conversations about food and farming, and many of us have heard of or read food labels stating “contains bioengineered ingredients” (another way of referring to GMOs). While many of us are familiar with the term GMO, not all of us are quite sure what it is—only, perhaps, that we are advised to avoid them by some people. A 2018 consumer survey by the IFIC found that more than one-third (36 percent) of respondents said they know very little or nothing at all about bioengineered or genetically modified foods, identical to the number who say they know at least a fair amount. Despite the low level of knowledge, a higher volume of respondents (47 percent) said they avoid GMO foods at least somewhat. But when we hear or read “GMO” or “bioengineered food,” do we ever think of the terms “safety,” “regulation” or “sustainability”? If not, IFIC is here to tell you that we should. Let’s look at how these three positive attributes are intertwined with GMOs and what that means for our food supply. Safety signals GMO foods have been part of our food system for more than two decades. The GMO crops available in the U.S.—soybeans, corn (field and sweet), canola, cotton (used in cottonseed oil production), alfalfa, sugar beets, summer squash, papaya, apples and potatoes—are as safe and nutritious as their non-GMO counterparts. The science behind their safety has been evaluated extensively over the past 20 years, including an in-depth analysis performed by 50 scientists that worked on a 2016 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report for more than two years. The NAS scientific cohort examined relevant literature (including more than 900 publications), heard from 80 diverse speakers at three public meetings and 15 webinars, and read […]

insights