As New Dietary Guidelines Spotlight “Highly Processed Foods,” Online Conversations Reveal Confusion, Polarization, And A Search For Practical Solutions
New IFIC Research Dives Into Digital Conversations Around Processed Foods (Washington, D.C.) — With the release of the 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) on January 7, 2026, processed and “highly processed” foods are once again taking center stage. A new analysis from the International Food Information Council (IFIC) finds that while attention is growing, online conversations remain emotionally charged, polarized, and often disconnected from the nuance found in expert food and nutrition guidance. The report, Digital Discourse On Processed Foods: Insights From Consumer & Key Opinion Leader Commentary, analyzes more than 135,000 social media posts from January 2024 through May 2025, examining how consumers and key opinion leaders discuss processed and ultraprocessed foods as well as what those conversations can mean for effective food, nutrition, and health communication. “Processed foods are firmly in the consumer lexicon. With the release of the new Dietary Guidelines for Americans and subsequent media attention, processed foods are poised for the spotlight once again,” Wendy Reinhardt Kapsak, MS, RDN, IFIC President & CEO. “Our research findings show many consumers interpret and apply food and nutrition guidance in ways that may not improve the overall healthfulness of their diets.” A Louder Conversation, But Not A Clearer One While awareness of processed foods has increased, IFIC’s analysis found that overall engagement remains modest compared to everyday concerns like food prices. When the topic does surface, the tone depends on who is driving the conversation. Millennial parents drive nearly three-quarters of consumer-generated content, leading with emotions and frequently expressing tension between health goals and real-life constraints such as taste, time, convenience, and affordability. Rather than aiming to eliminate processed foods entirely, many focus on ingredient scrutiny and incremental “better-for-you” swaps. Key opinion leaders—including academics, journalists, health professionals, and wellness influencers—tend to frame processed foods through scientific or policy lenses. However, expert voices are far from unified. “Credentialed health professionals often try to add nuance, while some influencers adopt a more urgent style of messaging,” said Reinhardt Kapsak. “The result is a fragmented information environment that can undermine trust and clarity.” Language, Labels & Lived Experience The report also highlights a gap between official terminology and consumer language. Although the DGAs use the term “highly […]
Media